Logo

User login

Browse archives

« December 2008  
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 105 guests online.

Syndicate

XML feed

Disney's Decadant Declineby Ericka Andersen (More by this author ) About twelve years ago,... Disney's Decadant Decline...

Submitted by admin on Mon, 2007-04-16 11:00.

About twelve years ago, Disney World’s first “Gay Day” caught some unsuspecting families off guard while vacationing in the famed theme park. When the Southern Baptist Convention called for a boycott of Disney World, gay rights groups rallied to support the theme park while social conservatives hoped for a lasting impact as a result of their movement.

Organizations such as Focus on the Family and the Christian Action Network (CAN) backed the Baptists, turning a deaf ear to Disney’s attempt at “acceptance,” though then-CEO Michael Eisner said in 1997 that the boycott “hadn’t had a financial effect.” In 2005, the Baptists lifted the boycott. And Disney went back to its old tricks. Last week, they announced that gay couples are now welcome to participate in their pricy “Fairy Tale” wedding package, which previously excluded those without official wedding licenses.

According to Disney Parks and Resorts Spokesman Donn Walker, the company is, "…not in the business of making judgments about the lifestyle of our guests.” But gay marriage tops the list of social issues slicing America in half, and this decision propels Disney again into the center of that political controversy. It also makes a strong statement about Disney’s foundational moral principles.

All it took for Disney to alter their standards was a single “inquiry” from one gay guest and a little criticism from a pro-gay web site, according to Fox News and Reuters reports last week. These two minor incidents prompted the rule change at warp speed, lest Disney be accused of perpetrating anti-gay behavior.

Disney Senior Vice-President of Communications Leslie Goodman told the Washington Post, "This is the very logical extension of a business we are already in.” But is it a “logical” transition when the action is apparently not a business move at all, but a political one? Over half the country vehemently opposes the idea of gay marriage and Disney doesn’t seem concerned with respecting the long-standing value of legal, traditional marriage.

Last year, the Senate voted down a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage. In fact, a recent CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll said that 68% of respondents did not think same sex marriages should be recognized by the law as valid.

Ironically, Disney’s target audience is families with children, a majority of those individuals being opposed to gay marriage. Disney has become an tool for a movement that threatens to eradicate the family values on which Walt Disney founded his brand.

In 2003, CAN released a videotape from Disney’s Gay Day documenting, “multiple acts of alleged public lewdness and contain[ing] extensive and explicit nudity.” The group maintained that “the Disney theme parks remained open to the general public, including children” during their taping.

After the 10 year boycott, Rev. Richard Land, president of the Southern Baptist Convention’s Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission told the Catholic Exchange in 2005 said this: “For most of our people, Disney used to be different. Disney was supposed to be a cut above the others. We expected better from Disney. Today, Disney is the same as everybody else. I think that most of our families now treat Disney no differently than they do other companies out in Hollywood. The boycott helped knock Disney down a notch."

The magic and innocence of 1930’s primitive Disney has been replaced with a politically correct fairy tale of disillusioned tolerance. And just like your childhood, the magic is gone. A name once supreme has now become common.

This is cache, read story here